(A)Political Newsletter - Volume 52

Good Evening Everyone,

The political cycle still has more to give until the big day! There are only 30 days left until the tides change again. Keeping it short and sweet this week. Let’s dive in!

In today’s edition: FEMA doesn’t have money, and that brings obvious issues to the table. Political chaos has been averted with shipping unions striking deals to avert a prolonged shutdown. Julian Assange speaks out against the CIA in short order after his release. The Biden administration is continuing it’s court battle fight for student debt loan forgiveness after a federal judge allowed a restraining order to expire.

  • FEMA is Broke After Hurricane Helene

  • Dock Workers Strike Deal, Avert Shipping Shutdown

  • Julian Assange Speaks Out Against The CIA

  • Biden Attempts New Student Debt Relief Plan

**Writers Note To Readers**

My job is not to be right, wrong, or indifferent in proving a point. The sole focus of the Apolitical newsletter is to provide information stripped of favoritism and emotional currency for or against any given idea or candidate. The distinction between journalism and human intuition is clear: human intuition is knowing that Boeing has done bad things; journalism is understanding that you cannot state facts beyond Boeing and whistleblowers not getting along.

FEMA is Broke After Hurricane Helene

Kevin Dietsch - Getty Images

October 4th, 2024 - The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not have the funds to see it through the rest of this hurricane season. That was the statement given by DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Wednesday to reporters who were questioning the agency’s status. Upheaval from several republican legislators were heard on social media, as they had choice words for the government agency who has distributed over $1.4 billion dollars since the Fall of 2022 to address the migrant crisis.

To state the obvious, Hurricane Helene did incredible damage to states like North & South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Florida. Hurricane Helene was a powerful Category 4 storm that devastated several areas, severely damaging local economies, houses, and infrastructure. Because of the extent of the destruction, local governments and emergency services were rapidly overburdened and had to rely significantly on FEMA for assistance. But the cost of dealing with a disaster of this magnitude has stretched FEMA to the breaking point, exposing serious flaws in its financial planning and budgeting.

Long-standing bureaucratic inefficiencies at FEMA are contributing factor to the agency's budgetary problems. The organization has come under fire for its lengthy procedures and delayed response times, which not only cause delays in the distribution of help but also drive up operating costs. These inefficiencies were clearly visible as the disaster unfolded. FEMA officials found it difficult to plan relief operations and to quickly release funding, which caused impacted towns' suffering to last longer and their recovery expenses to rise. Victims and pundits alike drew comparisons to the Hurricane Katrina response by the federal government due to the delays in helping the victims.

With $750 dollar checks as the compensation for the victims, more than a few pundits are drawing criticism towards a system designed to help Americans in need when several countries combined have received tens of billions of dollars in aid in 2024 alone. With this deficit of public trust in FEMA, it is likely that a complete overhaul of the agency could come if a different administration takes hold in 2025 in order for trust to be mended in a system that’s broken it.

Dock Workers Strike Deal, Avert Shipping Shutdown

Photo Credit - ILA

October 4th, 2024 - In what would’ve been a cataclysmic level of shortages for the United States, the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) struck a deal with the U.S. Maritime Alliance (represents ship & porting companies) in order to avoid a prolonged shutdown. In order to give time for contract negotiations, the ILA, which represents 45,000 striking U.S. dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports, struck an agreement on Thursday to postpone the walkout until January 15. The tentative agreement reportedly mentions a 62% wage hike increase over the next six years. Workers were set to start work immediately following the deal going through. Tensions had been rising for months as marine unions demanded higher pay, improved working conditions, and more extensive benefits. Key among the asks were a halt and complete ban on port automations, which would ultimately lead to job cutbacks.

The walkout was expected to halt ports, cause shipments to be delayed, and disrupt everyday supply networks that are relied upon by the lifeblood of the American economy (consumers and businesses). There was a great deal on the line, with businesses in every sector anticipating the effects of a possible suspension of maritime activities, from manufacturing to retail. Given the extensive ramifications, there was tremendous pressure on both parties to come to an agreement.

The public cases for why each side wanted what they did was pretty straightforward.

The union leaders underscored the physical demands, long hours, and hazardous working conditions that sailors and port workers encounter in their strenuous line of work. They contended that preserving a trained staff and guaranteeing the ongoing effectiveness of marine operations required more than just greater safety precautions and marginally increased wages. Shipping firms and port authorities cited the financial burdens made worse by international economic uncertainties, volatile fuel costs, and the requirement to make investments in fleet and infrastructure modernization. In order to successfully negotiate the challenges of global trade, they emphasized the need for retaining competitive pricing and operational flexibility.

The greatest asset that neither of the two parties had was time. For companies, profit was on the line, while workers can only go on for so long without a paycheck, Throw in the political upheaval that a shutdown would’ve caused a month away from election season, and it would've granted enough political ammo to upend the existence of what either party fought for in the first place.

Julian Assange Speaks Out Against The CIA

Frederick Florin - AFP

October 2nd, 2024 - Julian Assange is making a name for himself once again. Shortly after his release, Assange held a press conference decrying the actions of the CIA and other intel agencies. Assange was held at Belmarsh Prison in the UK, the equivalent of a maximum security prison in the U.S. He stated that the he spent his time (over 5 years) in that prison for “the crime of committing journalism.” He specifically called out the threats who were “wolves in MAGA hats” in reference to men like Mike Pompeo who led the agency under the Trump administration. With his first comments since being free, Assange made blatant callouts to the political and intelligence circles by accusing the CIA of executing long-running, well-planned attempts to discredit him along with making the effort to put an end to his leaking activities. The Wikileaks founder made specific reference to stories like those of Chelsea Manning who had their lives upended multiple times by the intel agencies he’s fought against.

Delivered in his remarks and reinforced by other media sources present, Assange's claims present a picture of an unrelenting CIA intelligence campaign directed on him. From the very beginning of WikiLeaks, he says, the CIA saw his platform as a direct threat to national security and started a covert mission to discredit and imprison him. Assange claimed that this campaign consisted of a mix that included media manipulation, psychological techniques, and legal maneuvers meant to damage his character and alienate him from his followers.

The timing of Assange's statements is particularly notable. The statements from Assange coincides with a period when worldwide debates on government openness, digital privacy, and the importance of whistleblowers are more relevant than ever. Assange's charges against the CIA not only highlight his personal hardships but also throw deeper concerns regarding the balance between the right to know and what the government deems as a threat to national security. While intelligence services have been given the power to protect information, critics contend that the strategies used shouldn't violate people's rights or limit press freedom. The situation of Assange forces politicians and the public to face hard facts about surveillance and responsibility, therefore testing these conflicting priorities.

Assange now enters a fresh phase in his fight for reform and vindication. He has shown his wish to keep advocating for a press that’s dedicated to free speech, and to reveal what he believes to be systematic problems in intelligence services. This commitment implies that Assange's influence is far from gone and that his activities will probably motivate and organize activists, reporters, and common people trying to question accepted power systems.

This audacious confrontation underscores the long-standing conflicts between transparency advocates and intelligence services.

Biden Attempts New Student Debt Relief Plan

Credit - AP

October 3rd, 2024 - President Joe Biden is once again pushing forward with his ambitious plan to cancel student debt, seizing the opportunity presented by the recent expiration of a federal judge’s restraining order. The expiration of the restraining order removes a critical legal barrier that had previously halted the administration’s attempts to implement debt relief.

This debt relief will impact four different types of borrowers. Borrowers who first started paying loans at least 20 or 25 years ago. Those who owe more on their student loans today than what they originally borrowed due to the impacts of interest accrual and capitalization. People who attended colleges that lost access to federal financial aid programs because of a failure to meet government standards. Borrowers who qualify for student loan forgiveness under other programs but have not enrolled or applied.

Biden's student loan plan has been under legal attack from aggressive and relentless state governments like Georgia and Missouri. Several states, along with political organizations have fiercely objected to the Department of Education's announcement to wipe student debt since the plan’s inception, which resulted in a federal judge putting a restraining order stopping the plan from being carried out. Critics contended that the government overreached, as such large debt forgiveness needed clear legislative consent from Congress. This legal argument resulted in a deadlock that keeps debtors in uncertainty and stops the government from implementing its promised relief policies. The lift on this restraining order gives the Biden administration another chance to make it’s case, as it moves from the Southern District of Georgia to the Eastern District of Missouri.

Proponents contend that this relief is necessary to boost economic growth, lower financial stress, and provide people more chances to invest in their futures free from the weight of debt preventing them from so. Proponents also claim that cancelling student loans will help the government produce resources for entrepreneurship, homeownership, and education, therefore promoting a more vibrant and balanced economy.

Although the Supreme Court did reject earlier attempts by the Biden administration for student loan forgiveness, the political popularity on the left remains high for this to succeed, and therefore grants ammo to the democratic party to seize the moment while it can. With only a month away from the election, the political fight for student loan forgiveness remains on the ballot.

Join the fastest-growing news company in the world.

Covering geopolitics, global conflict, terrorism, crime, business, wall-street, underreported stories, and places in the world you've never heard of. Comments, twitter-style brief updates, long-form articles, full podcasts, and documentaries. Join 30,000+ members today on the Atlas News App.

Atlas News

What do you think of today’s Atlas Newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

If you'd like to get involved with Atlas News, please contact us with your experience or ideas. If you're a solid fit, we'll be in touch.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 Atlas News.1A

Reply

or to participate.