(A)Political Newsletter - Volume 49

(A)Political Newsletter - Volume 49

Good morning everyone,

Trump is officially back on X after his Twitter exile. It’s past the point of obvious, but our timeline is going to get more drama this political cycle. There are a lot of stories to breakdown! Let’s dive in!

In today’s edition: Trump is now using his massive following again after his 2 year ban from Twitter. A bigger spotlight is being thrust towards corporate Political Action Committee (PAC) dollars, as companies want even greater influence heading into 2025. Vice President Harris unveiled her plan to tackle rising prices by implementing federal price controls. Trump has reinforced his stance on wanting the killing in Gaza to cease and for the Israeli PM to end the war quickly.

  • Donald Does It Again

  • Corporate PAC Money is Making a Boom

  • VP Harris Unveils Price Controls Plan

  • Trump Calls For Swift End: No More Israeli War

**Writers Note To Readers**

The sole focus of the Apolitical newsletter is to provide information stripped of favoritism and emotional currency for or against any given idea or candidate. This newsletter is not intended to influence, it is intended to inform. We encourage you to derive your own opinion from the facts we present here.

Donald Does It Again

J. Scott Applewhite - AP

August 13th, 2024 - Donald Trump has returned to X, formerly Twitter, and created a more than notable shift in the realms of politics and social media in doing so. After nearly two years of being banned following the events on January 6, 2021, Trump had a live conversation with Elon Musk, X’s owner. This wasn't just any interview; it was an event that captivated the attention of 73 million views in a three hour span, with Musk claiming the event had reached a billion views with the 4 million related posts in that same period. However, the occasion was plagued by technical issues that Musk attributed to a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack—a claim that has not been verified by an outside third party as of this writing.

The buzz around Trump's return had been building for weeks. Musk, now a key player in political discourse, had publicly endorsed Trump for the upcoming presidential elections, adding even more interest to the event. Billed as "unscripted and without restrictions," the conversation was expected to cover a broad array of topics central to Trump’s campaign, including immigration, economic policies, and his plans if he were to win the presidency again.

As the event kicked off, technical problems quickly became evident. Users trying to join the live conversation on X's Spaces feature encountered error messages and endured long waits accompanied by elevator music. The platform struggled under the weight of the user influx, with Musk later attributing the issues to a "massive DDoS attack." Yet, the rest of X seemed to function normally during the event, casting doubt on the DDoS explanation. Some X employees reportedly stated that there was no such attack, and that the problems stemmed from the platform’s technical limitations.

When the conversation eventually got underway, it peaked at around 1.4 million concurrent listeners. Musk's claim of a billion views, however, was based on the total impressions related to the event, including all interactions and discussions by other accounts—a figure criticized as misleading since it conflates impressions with actual live viewership.

The content of the conversation itself was familiar territory for Trump. He aired his views on immigration, criticizing current policies and vowing to implement the largest deportation in U.S. history if re-elected. The former president also discussed surviving the attempt on his life, calling it "not pleasant" and expressing gratitude towards being spared. The conversation also covered economic topics, with Musk and Trump agreeing on the need of robust military systems while also denouncing the present leadership due to the perceived failures of immigration, inflation, and other challenges being faced.

Despite the technical glitches and controversies, the event succeeded in drawing significant attention to both Trump and Musk. It highlighted Musk’s growing influence in political circles and his readiness to use X as a platform for political discourse. For Trump, the conversation offered a chance to reconnect with his massive following on X, which dwarfs his audience on Truth Social, the platform he launched during his Twitter ban.

Notwithstanding the technical hiccups and controversies, the event managed to bring Trump and Musk even wider publicity. The discussion highlighted Musk’s growing influence in political circles and his readiness to use X as a platform for political discourse. For Trump, the conversation offered a chance to reconnect with his massive following on X, which dwarfs his audience on Truth Social, the platform he launched during his Twitter ban.

The collaboration ultimately illustrated the dance between politics and technology. Musk's choice to invite Trump on X captures his general attitude toward free expression, but his willingness to interact with polarizing figures could lead to even greater heat from political adversaries. Additionally, the technical problems that hampered the event also reminded viewers of the obstacles that came with displaying content in digital form. This comes in contrast with Elon's rivals, who have access to the tried and true legacy media outlets.

Corporate PAC Money is Making a Boom

Wikimedia Commons - K Street Washington DC

August 16th, 2024 - The importance of corporation PAC donations has reached the forefront in political finance during the 2024 U.S. electoral season. Established by companies, unions, and other organizations, political action committees (PACs) have grown to be major actors in the financial flow supporting political parties and candidates. Early in 2024, PACs had already shown their financial influence in politics by already raising around $5.2 billion and spending $4.4 billion Federal guidelines restrict contributions; non-multicandidate PACs can donate up to $3,300 whereas multicandidate PACs are permitted to donate up to $5,000 each election to a candidate.

Company PACs usually align their donations with candidates and parties that back their business interests or policy goals. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and energy are among the biggest contributors, aiming to sway legislation that affects their operations. The impact of these contributions can be seen in how funds are strategically allocated to key races and influential candidates, often giving them an edge in legislative advocacy.

Corporate power in elections has been strengthened even more by the emergence of Super PACs, which can raise and spend limitless funds. While Super PACs are free to spend as much as they like independently, without directly supporting politicians, ordinary PACs have tight limits on donations to candidates. It’s no surprise that special interests want to have their influence, but the spotlight and criticism of this influence is going to echo further into calls for reform which can be carried out through either political aisle with enough voter momentum. The new Congress sworn in for the 2025 session will have an even greater balancing act, as they must increasingly show resonance towards voters who loathe special interests and reconcile that with the companies that provide ample opportunities for advancement in and beyond Capitol Hill.

VP Harris Unveils Price Controls Plan

Stephanie Scarbrough - AP

August 15th, 2024 - In order to combat growing inflation, presidential candidate Kamala Harris has officially presented her plan to enact federal pricing controls. This project is a component of a broader economic strategy meant to solve daily challenges of Americans confronted with rising cost of basic products and services. Harris particularly addresses what she refers to as "price gouging" by businesses, which she thinks is mostly causing inflation. Her proposal seeks to establish pricing limits on particular commodities and services, therefore guaranteeing a price for customers in erratic economic times.

Critics have, however, raised serious questions. A liberal columnist from The Washington Post warning that Harris's proposal would unintentionally support claims of communism from her Republican rival. The columnist contends that although the idea is aimed to safeguard consumers, the implementation of price controls could be regarded as administrative excessive authority, reminiscent of measures from communist governments. This emphasizes the thin line Harris has to negotiate—tackling economic problems without igniting political reaction.

Proponents of the plan contend it's a required action to curb corporate excess and protect underprivileged groups against predatory pricing. Their main justification for such actions is the widening discrepancy between consumer purchasing power and corporate earnings. Harris's proposal is considered as a means of making businesses answerable and guarantee that everyone, not only the privileged elite, would benefit from economic recovery.

With implications for the economy and the 2024 elections, Harris's proposition will probably become a central topic in the political debate as it develops. The success of the program will rely on how effectively it addresses inflation without so hindering economic development or so alienating the political environment. This makes the idea a high-stakes risk for the Vice President, one that might define her political legacy and the course of U.S. economic policy going forward.

Trump Calls For Swift End: No More Israeli War

Joshua Roberts - Reuters

August 16th, 2024 - Former President Donald Trump has openly pressed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to swiftly bring about an end to the continuous fighting in Gaza. Emphasizing the urgency of stopping the bloodshed, Trump said in his remarks, "the killing has to stop." His comments coincide with the escalating bloodshed, which causes international concern and results in general calls for a truce from world leaders. This intervention emphasizes Trump's continuous participation in world events and his close ties with Netanyahu, which defined his presidency. Trump regularly complimented Netanyahu for his leadership during his tenure in office, particularly on issues involving Israel's security and territorial concerns.

Trump's remarks reflect the worries of many foreign observers who are mountingly unhappy with the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Human rights organizations and urgent appeals for peace have criticized the conflict for causing major loss of life and devastation. Trump's need for a quick fix helps him to connect with people who think that prolonging the conflict could compromise not just regional stability but also the worldwide perspective of Israel's activities.

His comment also captures his usual method of handling problems, which is based on a taste for forceful and quick action. Trump has advocated swift answers to global problems throughout his presidency, supporting forceful and immediate reactions. Encouragement of Netanyahu to "win fast," by Trump, strengthens his conviction on the success of quick military and diplomatic actions.

Though Trump's impact on present U.S. foreign policy may be minimal, his remarks nevertheless speak to a lot of Americans as well as the worldwide community. His demand for a rapid resolution to the crisis could put more pressure on Netanyahu's government to investigate different strategies meant to bring about long-lasting peace in the area. The world is still preoccupied with how these dynamics will develop while hostilities in Gaza persist.

Join the fastest-growing news company in the world.

Covering geopolitics, global conflict, terrorism, crime, business, wall-street, under reported stories, and places in the world you've never heard of. Comments, twitter-style brief updates, long-form articles, full podcasts, and documentaries. Join 30,000+ members today on the Atlas News App.

Atlas News

What do you think of today’s Atlas Newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

If you'd like to get involved with Atlas News, please contact us with your experience or ideas. If you're a solid fit, we'll be in touch.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 Atlas News.

Reply

or to participate.