(A)Political Newsletter - Volume 50

(A)Political Newsletter - Volume 50

Good Morning Everyone,

First, our apologies for the lateness. However, the most important endorsement of this election cycle just happened. We’re going to see a serious shift in the political world as a result. Let’s dive in!

In today’s edition: RFK Jr. drops out and endorses Donald Trump. The DNC wrapped up it’s convention. The Supreme Court issues a ruling on an Arizona voting law. A federal judge has dismissed charges for a woman who owned a machine gun.

  • A New Political World

  • DNC Convention Recap

  • SCOTUS Issues Ruling on Arizona Voting Law

  • Federal Judge Dismisses Machine Gun Case

**Writers Note To Readers**

The sole focus of the (A)Political newsletter is to provide information stripped of favoritism and emotional currency for or against any given idea or candidate. This newsletter is not intended to influence, it is intended to inform. We encourage you to derive your own opinion from the facts we present here.

A New Political World

Evan Vucci - AP

August 23rd, 2024 - Perhaps the most consequential endorsement for a political campaign in the 21st century just occurred. RFK Jr. delivered a 49 minute speech stating that he was suspending his presidential campaign, as he granted his endorsement to his former rival. Given the long standing and intertwined nature of the Kennedy family’s involvement with the Democratic party, political shockwaves are being made across party aisles.

Kennedy voiced deep discontent with the present circumstances of American politics in his public speech, especially mentioning media power and deliberate suppression of speech as main obstacles to his ongoing campaign. Kennedy claimed that these were the key factors stopping him from getting a larger audience and gathering enough momentum to fairly challenge for the presidency. He acknowledged that he no longer saw a clear road to success and chose to withdraw rather than keep fighting a struggle he judged unworthy while still having the chance to affect the race in other respects.

Kennedy's support of Trump is poignant not only in light of their disagreements but also in symbolic weight given a Kennedy backing of a previous Republican president. Kennedy's endorsement, meanwhile, was not without background or logic. Following a series of conversations with Trump, Kennedy observed that they agreed on several important points, including free speech and healthcare especially. Should Trump be re-elected, the former president supposedly indicated a possible position for RFK Jr. in his government, emphasizing particularly healthcare reform—an issue of great importance to Kennedy. Said to be done with a cooperative attitude akin to Lincoln's "team of rivals," these discussions analogized that they could work together in spite of their differences for the good of the country. 

Kennedy's endorsement has already started to have an impact. For Trump, locked in a divisive contest for the presidency, this support could benefit critical swing states. Kennedy had attracted support from both Republicans and Democrats, and his exit from states like Pennsylvania and Arizona could very well change the balance of power in Trump's advantage. Political experts already speculate that even a minor fraction of Kennedy's followers choosing Trump could be sufficient to tip the scales in these crucial states, where the race remains on a razors edge. 

Still, Kennedy's choice has not been embraced everywhere. Although some of his fans show acceptance, others feel duped by the action since Kennedy could have carried on his struggle for a more independent road forward. Kennedy's family members were fast to voice their criticism of his choice as well. Kennedy family members made a public statement outlining his support of Trump as a transgression of the ideals long defining the Kennedy political legacy. Kennedy's choice to support a politician whose views dramatically deviate from the values their family has long supported was difficult for them to accept.

Unsurprisingly, Kennedy's endorsement has been discounted by the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which refers to RFK Jr as a "failed fringe candidate" whose impact has faded with time. Kennedy's endorsement of Trump will have little effect on the race, according to the DNC's response, particularly considering Kennedy's divisive opinions and the difficulties he had winning broad support. They presented the endorsement as a result of Trump's desperation as a sign of weakness rather than strength, suggesting that his interactions with Kennedy revealed this. However, it should be noted that the DNC has relentlessly sued his campaign to keep him off the ballot in many states.

Still, Kennedy's choice has given the 2024 presidential contest still another degree of variability. In certain critical states like Pennsylvania and Georgia, this support could be a blessing for Trump since it helps to unite his base and probably augment it. Kennedy's absence from the race and his alliance with Trump draw attention to the increasingly volatile character of political alliances in the United States, so reflecting the larger political environment. Kennedy's support of Trump reminds us sharply that politics in 2024 is anything but predictable in a time when party loyalty is less ironclad than it once was.

RFK Jr.’s endorsement will show its actual influence as the election approaches. For now, it is still a major development that will cause both sides to rethink their plans as they begin preparing for what promises to be an intensely contested race. Kennedy's withdrawal and support of Trump has unquestionably given the race a fresh perspective, disrupting the conventional political order and defying accepted wisdom from past political cycles. 

DNC Convention Recap

Justin Sullivan - Getty Images

August 22nd, 2024 - The 2024 Democratic National Convention kicked off in Chicago on Monday. Focused on bringing Democrats together before the November election, this has long been recognized as one of the most important events for the party every presidential cycle. Democratic National Committee Chair Jaime Harrison's call to action at the start of the week stressed the importance of defeating Trump while safeguarding crucial issues like maintaining democracy, healthcare, and climate change. He emphasized that Kamala Harris was the right candidate for the job.

Prominent personalities including Oprah Winfrey, Michelle Obama, and Hillary Clinton took the stage throughout the week, each offering their particular viewpoint and clout to support Harris's candidacy. Identifying as an independent, Oprah argued persuasively for undecided voters to back Harris, framing the election as a decision between common sense and extreme views. Unrestricted by the political constraints of her past position as First Lady, Michelle Obama gave an emotional address addressing racial inequality and generational wealth divides. Reflecting on her own presidential bid, Clinton urged the audience to grab the chance Harris's candidacy presented, reminding them that advancement is not guaranteed.

With speeches from politicians like Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, and Pete Buttigieg, who are considered potential presidential contenders, the convention also provided a stage for rising Democratic leaders. A homage to civil rights icon Jesse Jackson, stressing the party's dedication to diversity and inclusion, balanced the emphasis on fresh leadership.

The convention had tense times, too, though. Although the official platform mostly brought the party together, there were certain disparities, especially about foreign policy and student debt relief. While moderates argued for a more incremental approach, progressive leaders demanded more forceful actions on these fronts. Still, party officials put enormous effort to keep a feeling of unity and hope, consequently presenting an organized image to the public.

SCOTUS Issues Ruling On Arizona Voting Law

Wolfgang Schaller - Shutterstock

August 22nd, 2024 - On August 22, the U.S. Supreme Court announced a major decision about Arizona's disputed voting law. The ruling lets Republicans in Arizona partially bring back a law that says new voters in the state must show proof that they are citizens of the United States. Since it was first passed in 2022, this law has been the subject of ongoing court cases. Voting rights groups and the Biden administration have both challenged it.

Advocates of tougher voter ID rules will celebrate the Supreme Court's ruling since they contend that such policies are required to stop voter fraud and safeguard election integrity. Proponents of the measure think Arizona can guarantee only qualified voters are casting ballots by demanding proof of citizenship. The decision also rejects another section of the law, which would have obliged already registered voters to confirm their citizenship before casting their ballot. This partial decision implies that although the Court is ready to support specific regulations aimed at safeguarding elections, but it could be reluctant to allow more general modifications meant to exclude thousands of voters.

The ruling reinvokes the contentious argument about American voting rights and election integrity once more. Opponents of the ruling contend that mandating evidence of citizenship disproportionately impacts underprivileged groups, especially low-income voters, minorities, and the elderly, who might not have simple access to the required paperwork. These groups contend that they run the danger of being unfairly left out of the voting process, therefore compromising the same democracy that voter ID rules profess to uphold.

Arizona is still a major battleground state for the next election, hence the influence of this decision. The 2024 contest is predicted to be fairly close, hence even little changes in voter turnout could be quite important. Both sides will be closely observing how this decision influences attempts at voter registration and, eventually, the result of the election. Though the fight over voting rights in Arizona is far from finished, Republicans have won a major victory that could shape the political scene for years to come.

Federal Judge Dismisses Machine Gun Case

Photo by OxRanch Texas

August 21st, 2024 - Citing a recent Supreme Court ruling with major ramifications for Second Amendment interpretations, a federal judge in Kansas has notably dismissed charges against a woman accused of owning a machine gun. The case included a Kansas lady who had federal charges for owning a machine gun, a weapon variety that federal law has tightly controlled. But Judge John Broomes, nominated by former President Donald Trump, decided that the charges lacked validity given the Supreme Court's latest rulings, which have changed the legal scene around gun rights in the United States.

The decision of the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which underlined that any control of firearms must be compatible with the historical interpretation of the Second Amendment, was primarily referenced in the ruling. Under the new criteria established by the Supreme Court, Judge Broomes contended in this context that the federal ban on machine guns lacked enough historical precedent to support its validity. This ruling conforms to the Court's pattern of expanding the Second Amendment's meaning, therefore potentially permitting challenges to other long-standing gun laws.

This case is probably going to be a focal point in the continuous national debate on gun rights and laws since it highlights the changing court interpretations that might affect next legislative initiatives to restrict weapons. The ruling has also spurred demands for legislative action to close any gaps resulting from the court's present course on Second Amendment matters. It is still remains to be seen how this decision will affect forthcoming cases and the larger legislative environment around firearms in the United States as the legal community and legislators consider the ramifications of this outcome.

Join the fastest-growing news company in the world.

Covering geopolitics, global conflict, terrorism, crime, business, wall-street, underreported stories, and places in the world you've never heard of. Comments, twitter-style brief updates, long-form articles, full podcasts, and documentaries. Join 30,000+ members today on the Atlas News App.

Atlas News

What do you think of today’s Atlas Newsletter?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

If you'd like to get involved with Atlas News, please contact us with your experience or ideas. If you're a solid fit, we'll be in touch.

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2023 Atlas News.1A

Reply

or to participate.